כ״ד
לחודש השני תשע״ה
The
Israeli Supreme Court is allowing Jews to march through the Muslim
Quarter of Jerusalem's Old City.
But, why should we care?
But, why should we care?
YNET:High Court rejects petition to change Jerusalem parade routeJerusalem Day march will pass through Old City's Muslim Quarter as planned, despite argument by NGOs that route change would help prevent violence and incitement.
May 12, 2015
The High Court on Monday rejected a petition to change the route of the annual Jerusalem Day march and prevent it from passing through the Muslim Quarter of the Old City, according to local media outlets.
Two NGOs had argued that previous marches had led to calls for violence and provocations.
The justices reportedly said they were committed to combating incitement and would take a zero-tolerance policy towards those shouting racist slogans.
A police representative assured the court that law enforcement personnel were prepared to document instances of incitement and make arrests, said news sources.
Petitioners said the parade would unfairly disrupt local residents' lives, as it would force them to stay in their homes and close their businesses.
The march is scheduled for Jerusalem Day on May 17, a national holiday commemorating the reunification of Jerusalem after the Six Day War in 1967.
Last year's march was marred by nationalistic violence. Masked Palestinian youths attacked police officers with stones and then barricaded themselves inside the Al-Aqsa Mosque. One officers sustained light injuries.
Elsewhere, two young Jewish men were attacked in Jerusalem's Old City, they sustained light injuries and did not require medical attention. A young Arab man was also attacked, and said he was accosted by a group of Jewish youths.
Esser
Agaroth (2¢):
Let's
take a look at this report on the Israeli Supreme Court's decision.
The justices reportedly said they were committed to combating incitement and would take a zero-tolerance policy towards those shouting racist slogans.
Oh,
really? The differential treatment of Jews and Arabs is a consistent
pattern of the High Court. Whether we are talking about soccer fans
of religious leaders, Jews have clearly been treated more harshly
than Arabs, who often do not receive any punishment at all.
A police representative assured the court that law enforcement personnel were prepared to document instances of incitement and make arrests, said news sources.
Just
like the deMOCKratic, Israeli Justice system, the Israeli Police seem
to be more interested in Jewish offenders than Arab ones.
Special riot police presence on the Temple Mount: They are there for the Jews, not the Arabs. |
Petitioners said the parade would unfairly disrupt local residents' lives, as it would force them to stay in their homes and close their businesses.
The
disruption local, Jewish residents' lives has never been a
consideration, when allowing Muslims and Christians to celebrate
their holidays. Just recently, the Jerusalem light rail was out of
service in the evening for Palm Sunday observances, and a Christian
sect was allowed to perform Baptisms on Shabbath, in a public
facility.
Former MK Moshe Feiglin (3rd from left) and other Jews on the Temple Mount. |
Jews
are unable to ascend Har HaBayith (Temple Mount) on Muslim holidays,
including every Friday during Ramadan, if not the entire month. Jews
are prevented from praying on Har HaBayith ever.
All
of these events have very much disrupted the lives of local, Jewish
residents lives.
And
speaking of Har HaBayith, I believe that this is the real basis for
the Supreme Court's decision.
Either
the Supreme Court wants to appease activists by causing them to
believe that they are gaining ground in the battle for Jewish,
religious rights, in an attempt to take away the focus from Har HaBayith.
In
other words, the Court's ruling, allowing Jews to march through the
Muslim Quarter is really not the big deal you might have thought that
it was.
Har HaBayith-The Temple Mount is.
Har HaBayith-The Temple Mount is.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Anonymous comments will not be accepted without a name.